The government plans to drop some criminal cases related to the Gen Z movement while keeping those involving serious crimes and violence.
On Monday, the Cabinet approved a report from a three-member committee led by former Special Court chairperson Baburam Regmi, which recommended dropping specific cases.
The report is now with the Ministry of Home Affairs for further action.
The committee was established to review criminal cases from the Gen Z protests and suggest withdrawals where legally justified.
Serious Crimes Must Be Retained
“The report states that cases involving force against security personnel, attacks on police stations, and weapon theft should remain,” according to a statement.
It also advises keeping cases related to vandalism and arson of state properties, including the Supreme Court, Federal Parliament, and Singha Durbar.
So far, 400 criminal cases have been filed following the Gen Z protests that began in Kathmandu in September 2025.
Out of these, 100 cases are recommended for retention due to their serious nature.
Some Property Damage Cases May Be Dropped
The committee suggests dropping cases related to damage to private properties.
“Cases could be dropped if the accused admit their offense and agree to compensate the property owners. Additionally, cases may be dismissed if the property owner forgives the accused,” the statement noted.
It also recommends obtaining permission from the complainant or victim before dropping any criminal cases.
Charges Against Peaceful Protesters Should Be Dropped
The committee further recommends dismissing cases against individuals who participated peacefully in protests, sang slogans, or marched without committing other offenses.
“This recommendation aims to distinguish between peaceful protesters and those engaged in criminal activities,” the statement explained.
Legal Steps for Case Withdrawals
The committee advises the government to adhere to the Criminal Procedure Code and the Government Cases Withdrawal Procedure, 2020, when withdrawing any criminal cases.
“The Cabinet’s decision to forward the report to the Home Ministry does not guarantee automatic case withdrawals; further action is required from the ministry,” the statement clarified.